Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 1328 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 6% cheaper than Arc A750 - $226.72 vs $239.99
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 120 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 129% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 55 vs 24 FPS
- Up to 54% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - $4.36 vs $9.45 per FPS
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $226.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 452 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$239.99
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 451 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
31%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
31%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Alchemist |
$279 | MSRP | $289 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |