Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1062 days older than the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 167% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro W6400 - 24 vs 9 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - $226.72 vs $243.49
- Up to 65% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro W6400 - $9.45 vs $27.05 per FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 50 vs 120 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
24
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$226.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $226.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2465 minutes ago
Buy for $243.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
65%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$279 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |