Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 1002 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than GeForce GTX 1650 - 73 vs 72 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 36% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - $154.99 vs $243.49
- Up to 36% better value when playing F1 22 than Radeon Pro W6400 - $2.15 vs $3.34 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
73
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.34/FPS
64%
Price, $
$243.49
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $243.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10728 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
72
98%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$154.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10729 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
83%
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |