Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1062 days older than the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 50 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 11% better in Far Cry 5 than Radeon Pro W6400 - 122 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - $187.26 vs $243.49
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 6 vs 4 GB
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $243.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73852 minutes ago
Buy for $187.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73853 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
87.79425612052731%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
65.86227192466157%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |