Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 1912 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 13% better in Deathloop than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti - 61 vs 54 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti - 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Up to 7% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - $227.0 vs $243.49
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $243.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73829 minutes ago
Buy for $227 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73830 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
59.71309827054565%
Texel Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
59.714030384271666%
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Not Available | MSRP | $139 |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1291 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1392 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1752 MHz |