Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 2603 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 175 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 59% better in Valheim than Radeon R9 Nano - 119 vs 75 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 8 vs 4 GB
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$239.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7747 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
$649 | MSRP | $289 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
HBM | Type | GDDR6 |
4096-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |