Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 130 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 61% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile - 111 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile - 6 vs 4 GB
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
111
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
17.31 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
34.62 GTexel/s
20%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Mobile | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
64 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1082 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |