Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
ASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti EVO OC Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 3.0, 6GB GDDR6, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4, Space-Grade Lubricant, Compact Design, GPU Tweak II)

Buy for $225 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 197 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
ASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti EVO OC Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 3.0, 6GB GDDR6, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4, Space-Grade Lubricant, Compact Design, GPU Tweak II)

Buy for $225 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 197 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 130 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

  • Consumes up to 46% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 65 vs 120 Watts

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

  • Performs up to 61% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile - 111 vs 69 FPS
  • Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile - 6 vs 4 GB
This is a free version of No Man's Sky.
No Man's Sky

No Man's Sky

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile Logo
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019


FPS

69

62%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019


FPS

111

100%

Value, $/FPS

$2.03/FPS

100%

Price, $

$225

100%

FPS and Value Winner

ASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti EVO OC Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 3.0, 6GB GDDR6, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4, Space-Grade Lubricant, Compact Design, GPU Tweak II)

Buy for $225 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 197 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile Logo
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile Logo
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

17.31 GPixel/s

20%

Texel Fillrate

34.62 GTexel/s

20%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

84.96 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

169.9 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile Logo

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Jul 2nd, 2019
Release DateFeb 22nd, 2019
Radeon Pro MobileGenerationGeForce 16
Not AvailableMSRP$279
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aOutputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
NonePower Connectors1x 8-pin
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
4 GBMemory
6 GB
GDDR5TypeGDDR6
128-bitBus192-bit
64 GB/sBandwidth
288 GB/s
1082 MHzBase Clock Speed
1500 MHz
Not AvailableBoost Clock Speed1770 MHz
1000 MHzMemory Clock Speed
1500 MHz

Builds Using Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

No Man's Sky, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.