Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is 119 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Performs up to 60% better in Elden Ring than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile - 64 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile - 6 vs 4 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
FPS
64
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $189.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 268 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
17.31 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
34.62 GTexel/s
22%
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Mobile | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $229 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
64 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
1082 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
1000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |