Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 OC 4G (rev. 4.0) Graphics Card, 4GB GDDR6 128-bit, GV-N1656OC-4GD G40 Video Card

Buy for $154.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 160 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 OC 4G (rev. 4.0) Graphics Card, 4GB GDDR6 128-bit, GV-N1656OC-4GD G40 Video Card

Buy for $154.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 160 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 70 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

  • Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 65 vs 75 Watts

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

  • Performs up to 11% better in Rust than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile - 98 vs 88 FPS
This is a free version of Rust.
Rust

Rust

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile Logo
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019


FPS

88

89%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

98

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.58/FPS

100%

Price, $

$154.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 OC 4G (rev. 4.0) Graphics Card, 4GB GDDR6 128-bit, GV-N1656OC-4GD G40 Video Card

Buy for $154.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 160 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile Logo
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile Logo
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

17.31 GPixel/s

32%

Texel Fillrate

34.62 GTexel/s

37%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile Logo

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Jul 2nd, 2019
Release DateApr 23rd, 2019
Radeon Pro MobileGenerationGeForce 16
Not AvailableMSRP$149
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aOutputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
NonePower ConnectorsNone
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
4 GBMemory4 GB
GDDR5TypeGDDR5
128-bitBus128-bit
64 GB/sBandwidth
128.1 GB/s
1082 MHzBase Clock Speed
1485 MHz
Not AvailableBoost Clock Speed1665 MHz
1000 MHzMemory Clock Speed
2001 MHz

Builds Using Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile or GeForce GTX 1650

Rust, 1920 x 1080, High

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.