Buy on Amazon
€88.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1344 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5520 - 222 vs 219 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E5520 - 55 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Gainestown | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
