Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 3307 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5520 - 181 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5520 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Gainestown | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |