Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 730 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 159 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6346 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
