Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1220 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 3% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 227 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
350
57.56578947368421%
Multi-Core
998
95.68552253116012%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |