Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 730 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 7% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 479 vs 446 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
479
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €37.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |