Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3692 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 17% better in Fortnite than Celeron G1610 - 249 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €88.88 vs €607.99
- Up to 83% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-13900KS - €0.42 vs €2.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 55 vs 150 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
249
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.44/FPS
17%
Price, €
€607.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €607.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 397 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
212
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
150 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |