Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 14% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10900K - 197 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €476.59 vs €606.99
- Up to 11% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-13900KS - €2.75 vs €3.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.08/FPS
89%
Price, €
€606.99
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for €606.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
173
87%
Value, €/FPS
€2.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€476.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €476.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |