Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1952 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 949 vs 750 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €379.64 vs €575.67
- Up to 16% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-13900F - €0.51 vs €0.61 per FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
949
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
83%
Price, €
€575.67
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €575.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
750
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |