Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1277 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 3400G - 480 vs 401 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €95.0 vs €532.27
- Up to 78% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-13900F - €0.24 vs €1.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
480
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
21%
Price, €
€532.27
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €532.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Buy for €95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |