Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i9-13900F vs Celeron G1610

Core i9-13900F vs Celeron G1610: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900F

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900F Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 MB, fino a 5,6 GHz

Buy for 584.49 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 265 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900F

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900F Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 MB, fino a 5,6 GHz

Buy for 584.49 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 265 minutes ago

vs

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F

  • Performs up to 109% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1610 - 270 vs 129 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610

  • Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €88.88 vs €584.49
  • Up to 68% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-13900F - €0.69 vs €2.16 per FPS
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of War Thunder.
War Thunder

War Thunder

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Movie

Intel Core i9-13900F Logo
Core i9-13900F

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

270

100%

Value, €/FPS

€2.16/FPS

31%

Price, €

€584.49

15%

FPS Winner

Intel® Core™ i9-13900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 MB, fino a 5,6 GHz

Buy for 584.49 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 265 minutes ago

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

129

47%

Value, €/FPS

€0.69/FPS

100%

Price, €

€88.88

100%

Value Winner

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Movie

Intel Core i9-13900F Logo
Core i9-13900F

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i9-13900F Logo
Core i9-13900F

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2730

100%

Multi-Core

17219

100%

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

426

15%

Multi-Core

739

4%

Intel Core i9-13900F Logo

Intel Core i9-13900F

vs
Intel Celeron G1610 Logo

Intel Celeron G1610

Jan 4th, 2023
Release DateDec 3rd, 2012
Core i9CollectionCeleron
Raptor LakeCodenameIvy Bridge
Intel Socket 1700SocketIntel Socket 1155
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
24
Cores2
32
Threads2
2.0 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.6 GHz
5.6 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
Not AvailableTDP55 W
10 nm
Process Size22 nm
20.0xMultiplier
26.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
Intel HD
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.