Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3503 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-4670K - 480 vs 407 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €107.37 vs €584.49
- Up to 79% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-13900F - €0.26 vs €1.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
480
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
21%
Price, €
€584.49
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €584.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
407
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€107.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €107.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 84 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |