Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1141 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 33% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 3000G - 132 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €66.94 vs €376.99
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €376.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1072 minutes ago
Buy for €66.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 327 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
35.05494505494505%
Multi-Core
1975
11.469887914513038%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |