Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 1427 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - €81.67 vs €406.02
- Up to 74% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-14700KF - €0.5 vs €1.89 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 32% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Athlon 3000G - 215 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 28 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
163
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.89/FPS
26%
Price, €
€406.02
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €406.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |