Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 776 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €81.31 vs €481.63
- Up to 82% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-12900F - €0.37 vs €2.0 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Fortnite than Athlon 3000G - 241 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
220
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Buy for €481.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |