Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1141 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €103.99 vs €525.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-13900F - €0.59 vs €2.05 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 47% better in Rust than Athlon 3000G - 257 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
175
68%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€103.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €103.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
257
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.05/FPS
28%
Price, €
€525.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €525.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |