Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 230 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 35% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Athlon 3000G - 409 vs 303 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
303
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€83.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €83.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Picasso | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |