Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1510 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - €66.94 vs €285.41
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 64% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Athlon 3000G - 497 vs 303 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €66.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
Buy for €285.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
40.72340425531915%
Multi-Core
1975
17.387093934325204%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |