Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 482 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €66.94 vs €276.66
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Athlon 3000G - 130 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €66.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
Buy for €276.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 268 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
44.081068631966836%
Multi-Core
1975
21.53527423399847%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |