Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1042 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €81.91 vs €324.03
- Up to 68% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13600K - €0.67 vs €2.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 27% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Athlon 3000G - 156 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
123
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
32%
Price, €
€324.03
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €324.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |