Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-2600S - 194 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €77.34 vs €584.49
- Up to 86% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i9-13900F - €0.41 vs €3.01 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.01/FPS
13%
Price, €
€584.49
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €584.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
189
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |