Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1952 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 109% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 94 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 31% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €5.8 vs €8.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €379.64 vs €544.99
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
94
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€544.99
69%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €544.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
45
47%
Value, €/FPS
€8.44/FPS
68%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |