Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 600 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 202 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €311.39 vs €379.64
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €311.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74573 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
185
91.58415841584159%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€379.64
82%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74573 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
75.40348612007747%
Multi-Core
5794
92.6150895140665%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |