Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 4020 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 8% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i7-965 - 221 vs 205 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
221
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13479 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Athlon |
Bloomfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |