Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2479 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Core i7-965 - 46 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
46
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |