Key Differences
In short — Core i7-870 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-870 is 1182 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Celeron G1610 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €60.8 vs €72.66
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-870 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-870 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €60.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74368 minutes ago
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74368 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
88.38174273858921%
Multi-Core
739
46.92063492063492%
Intel Core i7-870 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |