Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1666 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 52% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1610 - 220 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing F1 23 than Celeron G1610 - €0.59 vs €0.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - €88.88 vs €129.0
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129
68%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15735 minutes ago
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |