Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 792 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 263 vs 259 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €182.66 vs €379.64
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €182.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74435 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
259
98.47908745247148%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€379.64
48%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74435 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
90.33255993812838%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |