Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1950 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €203.76 vs €379.64
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Core i7-3770K - 201 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 16 vs 8 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €203.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74260 minutes ago
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74262 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
707
60.53082191780822%
Multi-Core
2469
42.61304798066966%
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |