Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1950 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €261.4 vs €379.64
- Up to 29% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €2.03 vs €2.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3770K - 133 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 16 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
129
96%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€261.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €261.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.85/FPS
71%
Price, €
€379.64
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |