Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700 is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700
- Performs up to 38% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610 - 157 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 28 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75682 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
15.667524825303419%
Multi-Core
739
4.50280282719961%
Intel Core i7-14700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |