Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 302% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G1610 - 185 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - €88.88 vs €367.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-13700KF - €1.93 vs €1.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €367 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
46
24%
Value, €/FPS
€1.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |