Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 1853 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 262 vs 239 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €314.74 vs €379.64
- Up to 25% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €1.2 vs €1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
262
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€314.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €314.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
239
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
75%
Price, €
€379.64
82%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |