Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-10105F - 236 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €69.02 vs €268.3
- Up to 75% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-10700F - €0.29 vs €1.14 per FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
25%
Price, €
€268.3
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €268.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
234
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |