Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600K is 559 days older than the more expensive Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Diablo IV than Core i7-10700F - 222 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €198.88 vs €278.88
- Up to 32% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i7-10700F - €0.9 vs €1.32 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €278.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15396 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€198.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €198.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |