Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 279 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €74.94 vs €223.65
- Up to 65% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-10700F - €0.28 vs €0.8 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
279
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
35%
Price, €
€223.65
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €223.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
268
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |