Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13600K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €278.88 vs €301.02
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-10700F - 282 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-10700F - €1.07 vs €1.13 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €278.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18175 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
282
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€301.02
92%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €301.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |