Buy on Amazon
€129
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 478 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €129.0 vs €255.66
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Core i5-9400F - 121 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i5-9400F processore 2,9 GHz Box 9 MB Smart Cache
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78114 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-10700F processor 2.9 GHz 16 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €255.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
85.48387096774194%
Multi-Core
4834
66.85105794495921%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i5-9400F or Core i7-10700F
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered, 1920 x 1080, Very High
1 FPS
€729/FPS
GeForce GT 710
Core i7-10700F
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€729
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
