Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 1092 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - €158.88 vs €280.99
- Up to 29% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-12700F - €0.29 vs €0.41 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 23% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-9400F - 682 vs 555 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 20 vs 6 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
555
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12970 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
682
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
70%
Price, €
€280.99
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €280.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12970 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |