Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF and the cheaper Core i7-10700F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €278.88 vs €349.57
- Up to 19% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-10900KF - €1.56 vs €1.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-10700F - 181 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 20 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€278.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €278.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15364 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.93/FPS
80%
Price, €
€349.57
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for €349.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15364 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |