Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600K is 35 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 180 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €256.88 vs €379.64
- Up to 34% better value when playing Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €1.43 vs €2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 16 vs 6 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€256.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €256.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5461 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
175
97%
Value, €/FPS
€2.17/FPS
65%
Price, €
€379.64
67%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |