Buy on Amazon
€10.42
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $176
Availability
MSRP in USD: $176
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2063 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Up to 83% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €10.42 vs €60.9
- Up to 82% better value when playing Rust than Celeron G3900 - €0.07 vs €0.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in Rust than Core i5-650 - 159 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i5-650 - 51 vs 73 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
BQTEC Intel Core i5-650 3.20 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 4 MB Cache 73 W CPU Processore LGA 1156
Buy for €10.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-650
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-650 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 73 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
