Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €10.38 vs €117.5
- Up to 91% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i5-11400F - €0.07 vs €0.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Metro Exodus than Core i5-650 - 148 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-650 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-650 - 12 vs 4 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €10.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8570 minutes ago
Buy for €117.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8571 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-650 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |